Tek is a user on freeradical.zone. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
Tek @tek

This morning SCOTUS ruled that once you buy a physical thing, it's yours to play with. I'm watching patent lawyers lose. their. damn. minds over this bit of common sense and it's delicious.

@tek You have to understand a lot of patent/IP lawyers just had their careers destroyed.

Which makes you question why they built their houses on sand to begin with.

I suggest they go into injury torts.

@Elizafox "But this is the rent we seek! How dare that dumb SCOTUS remove our systemic inefficiency!"

I get that they're going to have to generate worth for a living now, and this does not break my heart one bit. 😀

@Elizafox *does a happy dance and buys a round for the house"

@tek I'm hoping one day software patents are invalidated too.

I strongly suspect they're kept up by companies with weak or no actual products and patent attorneys.

The theoretical basis for software patents isn't particularly strong (though copyright is).

I mean, someone basically patented the link list, for God's sake.

@Elizafox Software patents are utter bullshit. I have never, ever, not once, thought "I wish I knew how to do X. I know, I'll look in the patent database!" They only exist to publish co-inventors.

@Elizafox @tek There's always money to be made from disgruntled former employees taking out their grudges in the courtroom

@tek

This joins the two court rulings today that helped incrementally advance trans rights as well, making for a pretty decent day.

@ElectricMink Very! I've been explaining to my kids that while some things are very goofy right now, on other fronts we're making a lot of progress. There's good news and hope to be found!

@tek

Another area for hope right now - the push for single payer health insurance is gaining headway, not just in California, but states like Nevada are starting to make "single payer" noises.

@ElectricMink I think it's inevitable at this point. My company ran a lot of "what if" articles showing what would happen to prices under Trumpcare and it's not pretty.

@tek

The only good thing about the AHCA is if it becomes the law of the land, there's going to be a *lot* of anger directed at the people who passed it....might finally be the straw the breaks conservatism's back.

@ElectricMink I think you're right. I _hope_ there'd be a "oh shit this is exactly what they promised us they'd do, how could we have known!" moment.

@ElectricMink And I admit a certain amount of schadenfreude that the people hurt most are the ones most likely to have voted for Trumpcare's proponents. I know this is bad and I shouldn't feel this way, but I do.

"Haha, we'll teach those West Coasters a lesson! Wait, what do you mean 'black lung' is a preexisting condition?"

@tek

Anytime I start feeling a little schadenfraude about that, I suddenly remember *I* have a pre-existing condition that's already resulted in over half a million dollars being dumped into my chest and will, over the remainder of my life, cost hundreds of thousands more in the best case scenario. If I ever lose insurance, I'm hosed, big time.

@ElectricMink Yeah, that's terrible and things like that temper my gloating. I don't want anyone to go through that, even if I disagree with them. But a small part of me thinks that if someone brings around the situation where it's going to happen, I hope they're the one it happens to.

@tek Sort of. They can still get you under contract law (EULAs, probably) and DMCA. I'm really surprised that Lexmark didn't go after the resellers using the DMCA. That chip probably counts as DRM and circumvention carries a hefty penalty under the DMCA.
@sungo @tek EULAs/etc have been ruled unenforceable in Canada if they impinge on customer protection laws, FWIW.
@maiyannah @tek Down here in these here United States of Corporations, if a megacorp writes "no" on a post-it and hands it to you while you're eating dinner, you are legally required to stop.
@sungo @tek In our case it was a sort of push and shove between the government and corporations as to who wrote the laws.  The original case that set the precident broke the Rule of Law and the EULA tried to have people surrender rights they were assured under our consumer protection legislation.
@maiyannah @tek Almost all this bullshit exists because the supreme court ruled the corporations are people. EULAs and the like become a contract between people

@maiyannah @sungo I wish that were the case here. I hope that's revisited soon.

@tek @sungo Agree, the more I hear of US IP/Copyright law the less I like it, and I didnt like it to begin with.
@maiyannah @tek it will only get worse under this administration. What's truly amazing though about this ruling is that it was (essentially) unanimous.  It signals a really strong difference between what Trump wants and what the court thinks.

@sungo @maiyannah I honestly have know idea what he wants. As much as he's pro-corporate, he hates left coast liberals and I'm sure he'd love to "punish" California by removing some IP protections.

@maiyannah @sungo I'm pretty OK with most of copyright law (except the "nonexpiring" insanity), and trademark law is A-OK with me. But our patent system is just barking mad.

@tek @maiyannah If you roll copyright law back to before mickey mouse was set to become public domain, I agree. Ever since the Mickey deadline, shit's gone off the rails. The next copyright expiration of any sort won't be until 2019, after something like 12 years of nothing. it's madness
@sungo @tek Disney's lobbying here is hypocritical to the extreme since they GOT their money to begin with by cashing in on other's works.  And then making sure no one could cash in on theirs.

@maiyannah @sungo Definitely. Screw the mouse - Disney died 51 years ago.

@tek @maiyannah The issue is inheritance. If corps are people, disney corp can be disney person's heir. This has cropped up with the estates of authors. The children claiming they should still be able to reap copyright benefits from their dead-for-decades relative.
@sungo @tek Pretty sure this came up as recently as Discworld.

@tek @maiyannah @sungo Copyright, etc was supposed to be for a *limited* time. But "limited" was never defined. You are supposed to profit to pay you for your work, but then expire so you are motivated to create more limited time income. Not this forever crap.

@patrickme @tek @sungo Actually, the british law from which it derived specified a very concrete time.  The way that Disney et al have gotten around that is to constantly push back that number of years.
@maiyannah @tek @patrickme I think it's now author's death + 70 years

@tek @maiyannah @sungo I haven't read it lately, but corps got a longer treatment I thought.

@patrickme @maiyannah @tek corps are people. they get the same time frame we do.
@sungo @tek @patrickme Look up the Statute of Anne for historical context if you're curious.
@tek @patrickme @sungo "the Bookseller or Book-sellers, Printer or Printers, or other Person or Persons, whohath or have Purchased or Acquired the Copy or Copies of anyBook or Books, in order to Print or Reprint the same, shallhave the sole Right and Liberty of Printing such Book andBooks for the Term of One and twenty Years, to Commence from the said Tenth Day of April, and no longer"

That "and no longer" sure held up huh?

@sungo @tek @maiyannah Disney made it's money on public domain stories and they don't want anyone else getting the same "fair" treatment.

@sungo @tek @maiyannah @Patrickme honestly, everyone did before Disney. The Victorians would adapt everything and back again, across all available mediums.

And Hollywood was created because they wanted to avoid copyright from the east coast, so they went as far as to the other end of the continent so they couldn't be prosecuted, and those studios turned into Hollywood!

@sungo @tek @maiyannah why should copyright be inheritable? It's to protect the author and author alone, isn't it??

@8zu @maiyannah @tek Yeah, it's like patents. They're designed to protect and encourage initial investments, to make sure the creators get paid so they can hopefully afford to create some more. Copyright is not designed to provide funding for a creator's children who probably showed up for the reading of the will but not the funeral.